| Download the amazing global Makindo app: ✅ Means NICE/National Guidelines 2026 compliant Android | Apple | |
|---|---|
| MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: Educational use only. Not for diagnosis or management. See below for full disclaimer. |
Related Subjects: | AP of the Coronary Arteries |Atherosclerosis |Ischaemic heart disease |Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): Complications |Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) |Assessing Chest Pain |ACS - General |ACS - STEMI |ACS - NSTEMI |ACS - GRACE Score |ACS - ECG Changes |Cardiac Troponins |ACS: Right Ventricular Infarction
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, abbreviated HFrEF, is a clinical syndrome in which impaired left ventricular systolic contraction results in an inadequate cardiac output and increased cardiac filling pressures. HFrEF is generally defined as heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less. Unlike HFpEF, where ventricular filling and increased diastolic pressures are central abnormalities, HFrEF is characterised primarily by impaired systolic contraction. In practice, however, patients with HFrEF usually have abnormalities of both systolic contraction and diastolic filling.
The left ventricular ejection fraction is the proportion of blood present in the left ventricle at the end of diastole that is ejected during systole. It can be expressed approximately as:
Ejection fraction = stroke volume ÷ end-diastolic volume × 100
A normal left ventricular ejection fraction is usually approximately 50–70%.
Ejection fraction is useful but does not completely describe ventricular function. The severity of symptoms does not always correlate directly with the numerical ejection fraction.
The fundamental abnormality in HFrEF is impaired left ventricular contraction. Myocardial injury causes loss or dysfunction of functioning cardiac muscle. The ventricle cannot generate normal contractile force, stroke volume falls and end-systolic volume increases. Over time the ventricle commonly undergoes pathological remodelling.
The initial fall in cardiac output activates several compensatory mechanisms. These may maintain blood pressure and organ perfusion in the short term but become harmful when chronically activated.
A reduction in cardiac output activates the sympathetic nervous system. Noradrenaline increases heart rate, myocardial contractility and peripheral vasoconstriction. Initially this helps maintain blood pressure and cardiac output. Chronic sympathetic activation is harmful because it increases myocardial oxygen demand, promotes arrhythmias, causes vasoconstriction and contributes to adverse ventricular remodelling. This provides an important physiological explanation for the benefit of beta-blockers in HFrEF.
Reduced renal perfusion activates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
These responses temporarily support blood pressure but ultimately worsen congestion and increase the workload of the failing ventricle. This explains why inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is such an important component of HFrEF treatment.
Fluid retention increases venous return and ventricular filling pressure. Initially, increasing preload may increase stroke volume through the Frank-Starling mechanism. However, the failing ventricle eventually operates on the flatter portion of the Frank-Starling curve. Additional filling then produces little improvement in cardiac output but substantially increases pulmonary and systemic venous pressure. Increased afterload also makes it more difficult for the failing ventricle to eject blood. Reducing excessive preload relieves congestion, while reducing afterload can improve forward cardiac output.
When the left ventricle cannot empty normally, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure rises. This increased pressure is transmitted backwards through the left atrium into the pulmonary veins and pulmonary capillaries.
Initially breathlessness occurs during exertion. As heart failure progresses, orthopnoea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea and breathlessness at rest may occur.
Advanced left ventricular failure may eventually cause pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction.
Systemic venous pressure then rises and fluid accumulates in dependent tissues.
Renal sodium and water retention further contributes to fluid accumulation.
HFrEF is a syndrome rather than a single disease. Identifying the underlying cause is important because some causes are reversible or have specific treatments.
Common causes include:
Coronary artery disease is one of the most important causes of HFrEF.
Myocardial infarction permanently destroys functioning cardiomyocytes. The damaged region becomes scar tissue and the remaining myocardium must compensate.
Large or repeated infarctions may therefore produce progressive ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction.
Ongoing myocardial ischaemia can also produce dysfunctional but potentially viable myocardium.
Dilated cardiomyopathy is characterised by left ventricular or biventricular dilatation with impaired systolic function that cannot be explained solely by abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease. Potential causes include:
In many patients no single cause is identified.
Prolonged excessive alcohol consumption can cause dilated cardiomyopathy and HFrEF. Alcohol-related myocardial dysfunction may improve substantially if alcohol is stopped before irreversible myocardial damage has occurred.
Persistent rapid tachyarrhythmias can cause ventricular dilatation and impaired systolic function. Atrial fibrillation with a persistently rapid ventricular response is a common example. This is particularly important because ventricular function may improve dramatically when the arrhythmia is controlled.
Symptoms arise from pulmonary congestion, systemic venous congestion and reduced cardiac output.
Severe disease may cause hypotension, confusion, oliguria and cardiogenic shock.
Clinical findings vary according to the degree of congestion and cardiac output.
A third heart sound may be heard in patients with significant systolic heart failure.
It occurs during rapid ventricular filling into a dilated ventricle and, in an older adult, usually indicates significant ventricular dysfunction or volume overload.
The diagnosis requires a compatible clinical syndrome together with objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction.
Assessment usually includes:
BNP and NT-proBNP are released in response to increased myocardial wall stress.
Low concentrations make clinically significant heart failure less likely, while elevated concentrations support the diagnosis and should prompt cardiac assessment.
Natriuretic peptide concentrations are influenced by several factors.
The concentration should therefore always be interpreted in the clinical context.
Echocardiography is the central imaging investigation in HFrEF.
Typical abnormalities include:
Echocardiography also identifies important underlying conditions such as valvular heart disease.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can provide valuable information when the cause of cardiomyopathy is uncertain. It can assess ventricular volumes and function and may identify patterns of myocardial scar, previous infarction, myocarditis, infiltrative disease or other cardiomyopathies.
Modern HFrEF treatment should not be thought of simply as giving a diuretic and then slowly adding other drugs. Several drug classes alter the underlying biology of heart failure and substantially reduce hospitalisation and mortality. The aim is to establish disease-modifying therapy early and titrate treatment according to blood pressure, renal function, potassium, heart rate and tolerability.
Current UK treatment centres around four major classes of disease-modifying therapy.
These treatments act through different physiological pathways and their benefits are complementary.
ACE inhibitors reduce production of angiotensin II and aldosterone.
The effects include:
Examples include ramipril, lisinopril and enalapril.
Renal function and potassium should be checked before treatment and monitored after initiation and dose increases.
An angiotensin receptor blocker may be used when an ACE inhibitor cannot be tolerated, particularly because of persistent ACE inhibitor-associated cough. Examples include candesartan and valsartan.
Evidence-based beta-blockers counter chronic sympathetic nervous system activation. They reduce heart rate, decrease arrhythmic risk, improve ventricular function over time and improve survival. Commonly used agents include:
Beta-blockers should usually be introduced when the patient is clinically stable rather than during severe fluid overload or cardiogenic shock.
Treatment is usually started at a low dose and increased according to heart rate, blood pressure and tolerability.
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists block the effects of aldosterone.
Examples include:
They reduce sodium retention, myocardial fibrosis, cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalisation. Potassium and renal function must be monitored because hyperkalaemia and renal dysfunction may occur.
SGLT2 inhibitors are now a core component of HFrEF treatment irrespective of whether the patient has diabetes.
Examples include:
They reduce worsening heart failure and cardiovascular events and have important renal benefits. Their mechanism in heart failure is multifactorial and extends well beyond glucose lowering.
Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, usually abbreviated ARNI. Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin, increasing concentrations of beneficial natriuretic peptides. Valsartan blocks the angiotensin II receptor. The combined effect promotes natriuresis and vasodilatation while suppressing harmful renin-angiotensin signalling. In current UK practice, sacubitril/valsartan may replace ACE inhibitor therapy in appropriate symptomatic patients despite established guideline-directed therapy or where ACE inhibition is not tolerated for reasons other than angioedema. An ACE inhibitor must not be given simultaneously with sacubitril/valsartan because of the risk of angioedema.
Loop diuretics such as furosemide relieve pulmonary and peripheral congestion.
They improve symptoms but should be distinguished from the principal disease-modifying treatments that improve survival.
The aim is to use the lowest dose required to maintain euvolaemia.
Iron deficiency is common in HFrEF and can worsen fatigue and exercise intolerance even when the haemoglobin concentration is relatively preserved. Iron studies should therefore be considered in symptomatic patients. Intravenous iron can improve symptoms and exercise capacity in appropriately selected iron-deficient patients and may reduce recurrent heart failure admissions.
Atrial fibrillation commonly accompanies HFrEF.
Management includes:
In selected patients with HFrEF, particularly where AF is driving ventricular dysfunction, catheter ablation may substantially improve ventricular function and clinical outcomes.
Digoxin may be used in selected patients with HFrEF, particularly where additional rate control is required in atrial fibrillation. It may reduce heart failure hospitalisation but does not provide the mortality benefit of the principal disease-modifying therapies. Toxicity is more likely in older people, renal impairment and hypokalaemia.
Drugs that should be avoided or used cautiously include:
NSAIDs are particularly important because they may cause sodium retention, renal dysfunction and loss of response to diuretics.
Patients with severe persistent left ventricular systolic dysfunction are at increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator can detect and terminate life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Selected patients with persistently reduced LVEF despite optimal medical treatment should therefore be assessed for ICD therapy.
Some patients with HFrEF have electrical dyssynchrony, particularly left bundle branch block.
This means different regions of the ventricle contract at different times, making an already impaired ventricle even less efficient.
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy stimulates both ventricles in a coordinated manner.
In appropriately selected patients it can:
Patients with HFrEF caused by significant coronary artery disease should be assessed for myocardial ischaemia and appropriate coronary intervention. Selected patients may benefit from PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting depending on symptoms, coronary anatomy and viability of myocardium.
Stable patients should usually be encouraged to exercise rather than advised to rest. Cardiac rehabilitation and structured exercise improve functional capacity and quality of life. Prolonged inactivity promotes skeletal muscle deconditioning and can substantially worsen exercise intolerance.
Routine severe salt or fluid restriction is not necessary for every patient with stable HFrEF.
Advice should be individualised according to congestion, renal function, serum sodium and clinical circumstances.
Patients should understand how to recognise increasing fluid retention, particularly rapid increases in body weight and worsening peripheral oedema or breathlessness.
Acute deterioration is frequently triggered by another clinical event.
Common precipitants include:
Treatment requires both correction of congestion and identification of the precipitating cause.
Intravenous loop diuretics are commonly used when significant congestion is present.
Severe ventricular failure may result in an inadequate cardiac output to maintain tissue perfusion.
Features include:
This is a medical emergency requiring urgent specialist management and identification of potentially reversible causes such as acute myocardial infarction or mechanical complications.
Older patients frequently have HFrEF together with chronic kidney disease, frailty, postural hypotension, atrial fibrillation and polypharmacy.
This does not mean that disease-modifying treatment should automatically be withheld.
The challenge is to introduce effective therapy while monitoring physiological reserve and adverse effects carefully.
Some patients treated for HFrEF subsequently show substantial recovery of left ventricular systolic function. This is sometimes termed heart failure with improved ejection fraction. Improvement in ejection fraction does not necessarily mean that the underlying myocardial disease has been cured. Disease-modifying treatment is generally continued because withdrawal may be followed by recurrent ventricular dysfunction.
HFrEF is a serious chronic condition associated with recurrent hospitalisation, ventricular arrhythmias and increased mortality. However, prognosis has improved substantially with contemporary multidrug treatment and appropriate device therapy. A central concept is therefore to establish effective disease-modifying therapy rather than relying solely on symptomatic treatment with diuretics.